logoalt Hacker News

fortuitous-frogtoday at 9:50 AM1 replyview on HN

Looks largely AI-written, with some human edits: https://www.pangram.com/history/9afe7542-1085-4264-9691-2172...

FWIW -- I'm not as repulsed by it as the parent comment. But I do want to substantiate that it _is_ heavily LLM-written.

(If you're unfamiliar, Pangram has garnered a reputation as the leading LLM-detector, with a minimal rate of false positives; IME this has come with the tradeoff of being easy to manipulate/tweak your way into turning an LLM-generated piece of text into reporting a false negative, but for most folks that's worthwhile.)


Replies

darianvctoday at 10:11 AM

People do be having too much time...

Is the navigation of the site also AI generated? This doesn't make any sense and proves why these AI detectors don't work

show 1 reply