The onus is you to show it makes children safer - you’re the one advocating these privacy-harming rules.
If you insist on that approach, then for the sake of argument, you could pretend the discussion is about Australia which already has a similar law.
You could argue the benefit to children in repealing it.
alt Hacker News
If you insist on that approach, then for the sake of argument, you could pretend the discussion is about Australia which already has a similar law.
You could argue the benefit to children in repealing it.