Everyone's excited about using AI to make their quick end products. But no-one wants to actually build on or rely on vibe-coded frameworks, languages, or tools.

"Even it that'd be the best code and design in the world, I won't use it. I don't trust it."

Nothing about this sentence makes sense. What don't you trust about code you can see and audit yourself? What's untrustworthy about "the best code and design in the world"?

Yeah, I have prepared our company software for migration back to node.

I would like to read the promised Jarred's blog post (if it ever comes out) before pulling the plug though.

Anthropic stuff runs on Bun, that's why they bought it. Should they be careful with Bun? Could Anthropic be a high value target for someone?

> And for me 1800 files change PRs created by Anthropic overseen by one person is not necessarily adding to the package.

Bun is mostly AI written and AI reviewed at this point (all automated).

The 1-person is luxury.

The problem is that you need to twist the cube

might as well use openclaw at this point. that's the same vibe I'm getting with bun. from engineering excellence and jesus this guy really sweats the details (using zig woah!) to wow this is just openclaw ai permagenerated stuff. not a fan

For me it’s still up in the air. I won’t bet against them just yet. Also, did they say only one person reviewed it? I really doubt that. Don’t assume that what you can see on GitHub is the sum of all actions taken.

Im here with ya :)

It looks like quite a lot of analysis went into the rewrite

https://bun.com/bun-unsafe-audit

If the tests pass, then why not accept the rewrite?

An interesting article of Prisma using the rewrite:

https://www.prisma.io/blog/bun-rust-rewrite-prisma-compute