logoalt Hacker News

Billionaire Tax Officially Heads to Nov. 3 Ballot

27 pointsby simonpuretoday at 3:53 PM25 commentsview on HN

Comments

telesillatoday at 4:44 PM

Azim Premji donates every dollar he makes over 1 billion for the last 20 years.

Mckenzie Scott is working through donating her share. Same for Melinda Gates, Dustin Moskovitz & Cari Tuna.

Warren Buffet plans to donate the larger part to charity.

Let's keep building the good examples so the alternative (power consolidation across generations) is unthinkable for future generations.

show 1 reply
andrewjftoday at 6:10 PM

I mean, let's do it. But it seems more straightforward to tax wealth as capital gains when it's used as collateral for liquid assets (low interest loans, lines of credit, buying twitter).

hsnewmantoday at 4:30 PM

In the USA "all men are created equal". Owning money should allow you more representation than not owning money. Companies/institutions should not be allowed to spend money on politics, and a flat tax would solve this.

show 4 replies
Bostoniantoday at 4:00 PM

A "one-time" tax to fund recurring health care and educational expenses is an obvious lie.

0xytoday at 4:33 PM

Even if it fails, California has taken a multi billion dollar tax hit from all of the wealth flight as a result of this. Not to mention that those people may take jobs with them, straight to Florida or Texas or other friendlier states.

These taxes are an abject disaster everywhere they're tried. France tried it and it was extremely bad for them.

The cash raised from the tax is dwarfed by the wealth flight, every time.

Napkin math for just the people who have left already over 5 years show $50 billion in lost tax revenue. Probably far more in indirect losses (jobs, consumption, etc).

show 2 replies
xhkkffbftoday at 4:37 PM

All of the wealth has been taxed before, often multiple times. Adding another layer sure seems like overkill.

schacontoday at 5:38 PM

Love it.

In fact, we should have expanded it to be a "millionaire tax" where everyone who has a home worth more than $1M needs to pay a one time $50k+ tax to the highly efficient state government. I'm sure they can easily figure out how to sell a small fraction of their home to cover it.

If there is one thing that history has proven, I think it's how valuable dry taxation is for everyone in the long term.

show 2 replies