logoalt Hacker News

cryo32today at 4:35 PM4 repliesview on HN

You can do both with microservices!


Replies

mystifyingpoitoday at 7:11 PM

I get the joke, but in ideal world, in microservices, there is no such thing as code duplication across services. As a maintainer of a service, I should not give a crap about code present in some other service - it's some other team's code, why would I care? I don't have to even know that the other team exists. In big systems, it happens that I can't even feasibly know the existence of all the applications.

show 1 reply
zephentoday at 4:48 PM

But wait! There's more!

For $19.95, you can replace your single single point of failure with multiple single points of failure!

show 1 reply
mohamedkoubaatoday at 5:45 PM

Please, stop it

DJBunniestoday at 4:49 PM

Except 9/10 times microservices end up wildly dependent on each other, yielding a distributed monolith. Better to use service oriented architecture and just ship the monolith, you can test easier and skip the extra layers of serialization / deserialization.

show 2 replies