> That's a bit simplified, isn't it?

No, i dont think it is.

> He's pointing out precisely that "doxing" the entire population of Denmark shouldn't be acceptable to her

Denmark is a democracy, that is a decision for the electroate to make during an election. In general we give governments rights and abilities that normal people do not have. Where the line should be is up to the voters to decide.

> and that she's literally not accepting herself being "doxxed."

Not really equivalent. I'm pretty sure the Danish survelience plans, whatever you think of them, intend to have some sort of controls against misuse. (Im not saying that makes them good or ok, just that they aren't equivalent to doxing people)