logoalt Hacker News

kmosertoday at 5:36 PM5 repliesview on HN

Lots to comment on but this stood out:

> “A lawsuit like this heightens the demand for Generative AI replacements.”

Most generative AI corpora were arguably trained on copyrighted material, making the output potentially infringing.


Replies

FanaHOVAtoday at 5:46 PM

There is plenty of precedent being written here. It does not seem to be the case at all for the average use of this technology.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922

jterrystoday at 7:24 PM

Ye olde double edged sword

On one hand aggressively punitive copyright claims stifle creativity and innovation in transformative art. On the other hand, generative AI reopens that transformative creativity.

show 1 reply
CrimsonRaintoday at 7:22 PM

same goes for anything you output :)

rectangtoday at 6:06 PM

Even if the specific image being infringed were not in the corpus, it's possible that a court would return a judgment of copyright infringement.

Consider the case where someone deliberately prompts the AI to build a facsimile image and the AI does a creditable job after some tweaking.

ralph84today at 6:24 PM

Except everyone who has tried to argue that in court has lost.

show 1 reply