logoalt Hacker News

echelonyesterday at 10:07 PM4 repliesview on HN

Why not have a diverse set of energy inputs so your energy economy isn't fragile?

Some black swan event could kill solar. Maybe some mega volcano explodes. It would suck to be 50+% dependent on it in that case.

We should have wind, solar, nuclear, geothermal, hydro, tidal, and even fossil fuels. We should have a total capacity in greater abundance than what we have today so that we can grow.


Replies

rgmerktoday at 2:31 AM

If a mega volcano explodes and blocks the sun, lack of electricity will be the least of the world’s problems.

eqvinoxyesterday at 11:05 PM

Nuclear is the most expensive type of electrical power generation. Diversity is good, but enough of it is achievable with cheaper options.

show 1 reply
SugarReflexyesterday at 10:35 PM

Great answer, also I imagine that in terms of space, one nuclear reactor would be equivalent to 10 square KM of solar panels (or something like that)

show 1 reply
dalyonsyesterday at 11:26 PM

Because no one wants to pay for a lifetime of inflated energy costs (nuclear) for the off chance of it helping in a black swan event. Humans aren’t wired that way, and neither is capitalism