logoalt Hacker News

gruezyesterday at 10:57 PM7 repliesview on HN

>Is it the OMG BEST? no. But I Disabled wifi, and even the channel display.

Why not just get a (presumably subsidized) smart TV instead, and skipping the premium? It'd also be not disconnected from the internet, and despite vague HN/reddit speculation that TVs have cell modems in them, that has yet to be confirmed.


Replies

lbotosyesterday at 11:03 PM

I wanted more control and no UI. The commercial ones do that -- I think this was like $150 more than the "samsung smart ui" one... Never seeing a smart TV interface was worth that for me. YMMV.

show 1 reply
LeoPantherayesterday at 10:59 PM

If you do this, connect it to the internet at least once, because most smart TVs ship with missing features that aren't activated until you do a firmware update.

show 2 replies
Barbingyesterday at 11:19 PM

Some instead assert TVs might connect to the first open network available, like if a neighbor briefly opened a hotspot, which sounds more believable.

show 2 replies
initramfsyesterday at 11:11 PM

I use HDMI on my Smart TV and just disabled wifi because I realized it was downloading more than half my bandwidth (a small amount, in fact). It could have been doing an update but I found no reason to leave it on. Occasionally I'll use YT or Prime since it doesn't have to be tethered to a PC, but overall it's nicer as a monitor than a streaming app.

show 1 reply
afavouryesterday at 11:09 PM

I have a TCL Roku TV that I use disconnected and with an Apple TV. It still has annoyances here and there, like pausing for three seconds or so on every startup before it switches inputs. I’d pay a mild premium to not have that.

show 2 replies
helterskeltertoday at 12:27 AM

These days a lot of them will nag you if you don't connect them to the internet and only use them as a dumb display.

sidewndr46today at 12:08 AM

I don't think you can use the ones at wal-mart without an internet connection of some kind