logoalt Hacker News

Ancapistanitoday at 2:05 AM1 replyview on HN

While I would oppose a city setting up CCTV to be used the way Flock is used - that would be orders of magnitude less bad than Flock.

As it is, you can assume that at the very least, every time your vehicle has passed one of the >100k Flock cameras, there's a database entry and a photo that will never, ever be deleted. Your full travel history from this point forward is available for a nominal fee, and without any regard for your privacy.


Replies

Manuel_Dtoday at 2:11 AM

Who says the city's retention period would be smaller than Flock?

Furthermore, do you realize that you're free to photograph people in public and sell those images, no permission required: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nussenzweig_v._DiCorcia

People seem to struggle to wrap their head around the fact that privacy laws don't prevent people from recording them in public. You can be recorded at any time in public, by the government or another private person.

show 4 replies