logoalt Hacker News

tinfoilhatteryesterday at 7:33 PM8 repliesview on HN

Transporting families around comfortably should require a commercial license? Sounds pretty ridiculous.


Replies

rypskaryesterday at 7:50 PM

You are looking at it the wrong way. Driving something so large that it would require a commercial license to transport your family around is ridiculous

show 1 reply
NDlurkeryesterday at 7:49 PM

Minivans and station wagons are just as good as a Tahoe for transporting a family.

show 3 replies
bastawhizyesterday at 11:17 PM

My parents raised my brother and I in the back of a 92 Oldsmobile Cutlass. You don't need a vehicle where the hood is 48" off the ground to be comfortable.

throwaway173738yesterday at 10:25 PM

You could buy a minivan. The Toyota Sienna has more room for people and when you fold the seats down it has similar payload capacity to most of the trucks I’ve seen.

kube-systemyesterday at 10:16 PM

The problematic designs are primarily post-2009, as this fine article points out. Families had no issue finding transportation in 2008 or prior.

A 47” high hood line does not provide any utility to transporting children. Children are not stored under the hood.

show 1 reply
andrepdyesterday at 8:36 PM

Dutch grandmas can transport 3 kids to school on a cargo bike but young parents in the US need a 4-ton lifted truck? Odd.

show 1 reply
tinyplanetsyesterday at 9:04 PM

My god, you wouldn't want to ever be (shudder) ... uncomfortable!

ajucyesterday at 7:42 PM

What's more comfortable about SUV or a truck than a minivan or combi?

How is a tall hood increasing your family comfort? It only increases your ego.

show 2 replies