logoalt Hacker News

rob74today at 1:49 PM19 repliesview on HN

> Which leaves the only real question. Why 25,000 at all? It is my company and my risk. If I want to start with nothing, that is my call, not a toll the state collects before it will let me try. And the cheap door has a price of its own: to some clients, “UG” reads as “not serious,” and they would rather deal with a GmbH. The structure built to let me in quietly marks me for using it.

The 25,000 is there to make sure you can cover some liability. If you really wanted "your company and your risk", you could have used the "simplest setup", where you are liable with your own money, but if you think about it that way, it doesn't sound so appealing, does it? So of course the UG which does not (yet) have 25,000 in the bank sounds less serious than the GmbH that has 25,000 in the bank. A company that starts with nothing wouldn't be a GmbH (limited liability company), it would be a GoH (company without liability), and there's a good reason why those don't exist...


Replies

Zaktoday at 2:18 PM

> A company that starts with nothing wouldn't be a GmbH (limited liability company), it would be a GoH (company without liability), and there's a good reason why those don't exist...

Those do exist in other countries. An LLC in the USA does not generally need to have a certain amount of assets. Such a company is more or less without liability until it has some assets; the worst case for its owners when it comes to a routine business debt is shutting down the company. Exceptions are possible in case of serious misconduct of course.

Of course a company like that will find it difficult to borrow money, but it's not rare for its last bills to go unpaid when it goes out of business.

Whether those should exist or not doesn't have a clear answer. Culturally, Germans tend to be pretty uncomfortable with "sometimes shit happens and debts go unpaid", while Americans tend to find a moderate rate of that sort of thing tolerable, especially if it makes starting a new business viable for a greater fraction of the population.

show 7 replies
thomas_witttoday at 4:46 PM

The 25kEUR requirement has been lowered a few years ago to €12,5k as required paid-in capital.

logifailtoday at 2:29 PM

> The 25,000 is there to make sure you can cover some liability

I would suggest that this idea of a GmbH does not actually work the way you think it does. Maybe it once did, but not any more. For instance:

  Wirecard Technologies GmbH
  Wirecard Sales International Holding GmbH
  Wirecard Acquiring & Issuing GmbH
  Wirecard Acceptance Technologies GmbH
Much of the regulatory structures in Europe work this way, they assume that both good and bad guys will play by the same rules.

Spoiler: the bad guys don't care about the rules!

show 2 replies
nish1500today at 2:38 PM

High initial capital requirements have repeatedly proven to be more detrimental than beneficial (https://mariusring.github.io/web/BacherFagerengRingWold_Sele...). Germany is an outlier in wanting to keep the barriers high.

Running a business in Germany is for a closed inner circle. The apparatus is not meant for broke college students turning their weekend project into a company.

show 2 replies
Lariscustoday at 1:59 PM

The authors inability to understand this really makes wonder how much of the rest of their story is essentially self-inflicted.

show 4 replies
notanormalnerdtoday at 4:11 PM

I just did a quick check:

The 25.000€ hasn't been raised since the early 1980s. (50.000 DM back then) So to have the same liability today, you would have to put down 65.000€.

So it has gotten increasingly cheaper to start a GmbH in Germany.

solatictoday at 2:38 PM

This is not an argument that founders should seed 25k EUR to cover liability, it's an argument that GmbH bank account amounts should be visible publicly. If I want to put in a catering order, the catering business does not need 25k EUR to cover liability. If I want to build a data center, 25k EUR is not nearly enough.

show 2 replies
PowerElectronixtoday at 2:21 PM

The trust in a company should still be left to the criteria of suppliers, customer, etc. Not the random number that a bureaucrat pulled out of his arse.

tgatoday at 2:17 PM

You call €25k liability? I just decided I won't work with a company that can't cover €25M in liability. Should the state force you to block that in your bank account just in case you want to work with me?

show 3 replies
sarjanntoday at 4:00 PM

Isn't that what insurance is for? So you don't need to stash away a bunch of idle capital incase something goes wrong.

davedxtoday at 3:40 PM

Yeah I don't really understand the part about not being able to invoice either. IANAL but it's the other way around - you need a VAT number to invoice clients in Germany (and the EU), not outside of it. VAT is exempt for clients outside of the EEA.

Also: I've always used a ZZP structure (one man company - Dutch version) for mine, not a BV (LLC), because there's a thing called Professional Liability Insurance. But maybe it's different in Germany? I can't imagine that doesn't exist there though.

show 1 reply
arethuzatoday at 1:55 PM

When I co-founded a company in the UK in 1995 there were two £1 shares - one for each founder. Mind you it was an off the shelf company - but the process couldn't really be much simpler back then - and its probably a lot simpler now.

show 2 replies
puszczyktoday at 1:57 PM

You are right, of course, but in most jurisdictions the limit is lower than 25k EUR (e.g. in PL it's 5k PLN ~ 1.2k EUR; I believe in the UK it's even less), and you can trivially look up the capital of any business in the business registry online --> you can decide if you are dealing with a multi-million behemoth or a mom-and-pop shop.

show 2 replies
throw1234567891today at 2:56 PM

And you can start a company with €1. The format is UG. You have to keep 25%(?) of the profit until you reach 25k and convert into GmbH.

And reading the article, he does found a UG! This isn’t even about GmbH!

tomptoday at 3:37 PM

> The 25,000 is there to make sure you can cover some liability.

Is this actually true?

Can't the company just loan out the 25k immediately?

show 1 reply
nradovtoday at 2:05 PM

There is no need for a company to be able to cover liabilities. It's a stupid rule.

petesergeanttoday at 2:05 PM

> A company that starts with nothing wouldn't be a GmbH (limited liability company), it would be a GoH (company without liability), and there's a good reason why those don't exist...

What's the good reason? In the UK I can started a Ltd with £1 of share capital, about £100 of fees, and filling out a form online. I will be shielded from personal liability if it goes tits up unless I've broken the law, knowingly traded insolvent, or otherwise been an idiot.

The wider thread appears to be Germans commenting that it's unthinkable that such a thing could exist, and thus it's all the author's fault.

show 2 replies
chalmovskytoday at 2:06 PM

[flagged]