logoalt Hacker News

_fat_santatoday at 2:19 PM7 repliesview on HN

The US system is built to support entrepreneurship while the EU system broadly is to support the consumer and employee. The US will never be able to match the EU's consumer and employee protections and the EU will never be able to match the US's ease of doing business, because to have one you have to fundamentally give in on the other.

Depending on who you ask, one system is wildly better than the other, but at the end of they day they are just different systems with different tradeoffs.


Replies

logifailtoday at 2:31 PM

> The US system is built to support entrepreneurship while the EU system broadly is to support the consumer and employee

I disagree: the EU system broadly is there to support _the incumbants_

"Regulatory capture" is the less kind way to put it.

show 2 replies
bloppetoday at 3:30 PM

In a healthy market economy, entrepreneurs are meant to support the consumer, and they do so partly by competing with one another for talent, which requires supporting the employee. We could argue ad nauseam about the health of the US's market economy, but ultimately is has resulted in unignorably higher wages than in Europe, even at the lower end of the economic ladder.

This probably also has a lot to do with it's much tighter market integration than the EU, although they seem to be finally addressing that issue with the 28th regime.

A popular theory of Europe's historic economic outperformance relative to the rest of the world, leading up to the industrial revolution, relies on competitive market theory: constant warfare spurring innovation, as well as relatively free movement of the best and brightest to seek greener pastures elsewhere on the continent. These days, the most ambitious Europeans tend to move to America to raise money and find talent, and it seems many EU countries are finally waking up to the fact that they need to do better to support entrepreneurship.

show 2 replies
keiferskitoday at 2:27 PM

I think this is a false dichotomy. Consumer return policies, customer service, etc. tend to be much better in the US than in the EU.

I would characterize it rather that the US is pro-business and pro-consumer, but somewhat anti-average worker.

show 5 replies
danmaz74today at 4:04 PM

Even when the UK was in the EU, you could create a limited liability company (LTD) for something like 200 pounds or less, no capital needed. So it's not true at all that setting up a business at a low cost is somehow against EU legislation.

hyhatqtvtoday at 8:04 PM

> the EU system

Well in this specific case there is no such thing. Laws and regulations vary wildly and there are countries in the EU where you can register a company almost immediately at low cost.

blkstoday at 4:22 PM

25k requirement doesn’t protect anyone, just prevents regular contractors from easily registering limited liability company.

petesergeanttoday at 2:44 PM

> the EU system

The issue in question is a Germanic system, not an EU one. Outside of Germany, Austria, Luxembourg, most EU countries are far more sensible with capitalization requirements.