logoalt Hacker News

Georgelementaltoday at 4:45 PM1 replyview on HN

If you read the article up to the point where they describe the actual decision, it's quite different from the breathless outrage at the top. The reasoning is:

- In order to receive federal funds, state correctional institutions need to agree to certain standards, including the religious liberty protections.

- This agreement is between the federal government and the state institution; the prison guards and officials, in their personal capacity, never agreed to it.

- Therefore, the officials cannot be held liable in their personal capacity for violating the agreement.

- Notably, none of this shields the Louisiana Department of Corrections as an institution from legal liability.

The actual opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/23-1197_h3ci.pdf


Replies

secabeentoday at 5:29 PM

Yep. Nor does it prevent states from passing laws putting individual liability on guards who so flagrantly violate inmate rights. It's just not something that the Feds can do.