Because Anthropic has terms of service with more stipulations than just "you must pay and can use the service for any purpose"?
I'm sure all the artists and creators they stole from had stipulations too.
Robots.txt are also ToS of sorts.
violating their terms of service doesn't make it fraudulent?
So does a lot of the owners of data that Anthropic used for training. Anthropic preceeded to ignore said terms under the guise of fair use. Yet now they cry faul? Cry me a river.
To be clear: In principle I'm on Anthropic's side here. But Anthropic et al. have been very clear that they want to take a huge dump on those principles, so here we are.
Oh, Anthropic, the company that hoover'd up everyone else's data, and is now unhappy when others are doing to it what it did to others? The same Anthropic?