I am curious how this will play out legally.
Surely UI enough isn't enough to prove that source code was plagiarised?
In the event Papermark chooses to sue how will the defendant defend themselves short of presenting their own (possibly) closed source?
Most likely, Papermark would compel Corgi to disclose the source code during discovery.
> I am curious how this will play out legally
I am curious if/how YC will handle this to get ahead of earning a reputation of being a den of scammers - a few months after the Delve scandal