logoalt Hacker News

lovichyesterday at 10:36 PM3 repliesview on HN

My privacy is already decimated. For 2 decades we’ve already known about the NSA slurping up everything[1] on top of the Snowden leaks.

Then you have the mega corps like Facebook who can figure out every detail about you even from merely _not_ using their system because of the hole you leave in your social network that does use them.

The only privacy left is from anonymous troll farms claiming to be an American while talking about how the Texas oblast is valuable for its warm water ports.

I am fine for privacy on consumption of content, but you should be forced to identify yourself for posting so the common man at least has a chance to evaluate your statements instead of being misled, all while, as stated above, our governments and corporations don’t have that limitation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A


Replies

derf_yesterday at 10:49 PM

> ...you should be forced to identify yourself for posting...

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the right to anonymous speech is inherent in the first amendment [1] [2]. See also The Federalist Papers or Common Sense, without which the US might not exist at all.

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/362/60

[2] https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-986.ZO.html

show 1 reply
pclowesyesterday at 10:39 PM

I disagree because the people who have the most important things to say have the most to lose by saying it.

Also anonymity can actually improve social media polarization (see Chris Bail’s research)

show 1 reply
quantummagicyesterday at 10:51 PM

> My privacy is already decimated. For 2 decades we’ve already known about the NSA slurping up everything[1] on top of the Snowden leaks.

If you were correct, there would be no need for them to push these new laws. The fact is, you will have less privacy after these identification requirements are fully enforced.