That's not the problem governments are solving. They're solving the problem of convincing the public it's a good idea to end the anonymity of internet use.
That's why they are still appealing to sentiment rather than established research (which actively refutes the arguments they are making).
Precisely. The people in power would love nothing more than to stop “disinformation” (facts that cause social unrest).
I know! What puzzles me is responses every such article gets even on HN - let's build some cool tech that 95% of the general population and 100% of politicians won't even understand not to mention agree to.
Yes, government want to end anonymity and that's clear to some. But governments enjoy on a pretty broad support for this and many people supporting this believe it's a real problem. Suggesting to leave it unsolved or solve it in a way they can't trust or understand is only going to alienate them, making the government job easier.
I think suggesting a simple, cheap and effective solution to this problem that has no impact on privacy is a way better way to counter that. I think local parental controls fits the bill.