logoalt Hacker News

rvzyesterday at 5:11 PM5 repliesview on HN

Other than the worst naming I have ever seen (Sol / Terra / Luna), the pricing is still expensive:

> GPT‑5.6 is priced per 1M tokens across three model sizes:

> Sol is $5 input / $30 output;

> Terra is $2.50 input / $15 output

> Luna is $1 input / $6 output.

The OpenAI casino has never been more ready to take your money on gambling even more tokens.


Replies

minimaxiryesterday at 5:15 PM

Note that GPT 5.5 currently is $5 input / $30 output (short context) so Sol is in the same class, while Terra if the benchmarks are as claimed is indeed a half-price GPT 5.5 at comparable performance.

Stitch4223yesterday at 5:18 PM

With the $200/month plan I’ve never ran into any limits or issues. The product can be used every day for extensive sessions and development. What is everyone doing that makes them talk about tokens versus dollars?

show 3 replies
arikrahmanyesterday at 5:17 PM

Can't buy cheaper as a selling point when Deepseek is basically free when hitting cache? Unsubsidized too, cloudflare and digital ocean can be the model provider for similar pricing.

kingstnapyesterday at 9:25 PM

Don't forget this.

> For GPT‑5.6 and later models, cache writes are billed at 1.25x the model’s uncached input rate

Charging for cache writes is cringe and literally only Anthropic did it. Anyway this does mean the "real" prices are +25% on top of what you wrote there.

andrethegiantyesterday at 5:15 PM

What don't you like about the naming?

show 1 reply