logoalt Hacker News

alberto467yesterday at 6:08 PM7 repliesview on HN

Let’s be real, as an EU citizen I have zero doubts that those models would also have been blocked if developed in EU.

I like the US approach better: regulate when the need for it arises, not before when you don’t know how the situation is going to evolve.


Replies

ascorbicyesterday at 6:37 PM

They're not regulating though – they're arbitrarily blocking releases based on no clear criteria. The EU may be legalistic and rules-based, but I'd take that over capricious and arbitrary.

show 3 replies
LastTrainyesterday at 7:12 PM

You can’t be serious because “When the need arises” means when your company does not lavish praise on the current administration.

harimau777yesterday at 7:03 PM

Regulating when the need arises requires also compensating the people who get hurt in the meantime.

TheAtomicyesterday at 6:56 PM

It sounds nice but you end up with entrenched special interests that later oppose all regulation regardless of the consequences. We have pesticides you wouldn't want anywhere near your children casually used to control weeds on kid's playgrounds, insanely huge trucks that kill hundred each year, the food is garbage...the list is long and tiresome. Trust me brother, if I could live in the EU, I would.

fl0idyesterday at 6:34 PM

If they were real about risk, they would have to block a lot more models.

JoshTriplettyesterday at 6:15 PM

> regulate when the need for it arises

I agree. But that need has absolutely arisen. The US government is not exactly the best steward for this kind of thing, but some model other than "race each other as fast as we can" is desperately needed here.

psychoslaveyesterday at 7:14 PM

Let's plan a fire fighter division only once we are actually having some buildings in the city burning down. That people who fear that ridiculous perfectly controlled fire in chemines are ridiculous.