logoalt Hacker News

hereme888yesterday at 6:34 PM2 repliesview on HN

What do you think of modern open-source codebases presently available to the public? Is closed-source/proprietary code that much better?


Replies

jdw64today at 1:25 AM

Open source is much better. Closed source is mostly considered 'done' as long as it just works.

One is a 'craft,' the other is 'survival for delivery.'

aenisyesterday at 10:09 PM

Closed, proprietary code is way, way worse.

Good programmers are ashamed to push anything less than good (at least in their own opinion) to popular public repos. Some of those same pedantic programmers have no problem pushing crap in enterprise repos, and feel absolved because they are pushed to focus on deadlines, new features, and refactoring is very rarely planned for. I did and managed a lot of corporate software development in companies big and small, and did my fair bit of M&As and looked at codebases of successful companies. I dont ever recall feeling impressed. And I am regularly impressed by the aesthetic qualities of popular open source packages. I think commercial code is mostly shit, with the exception of regulated, serious industries (power, space, flight, etc.).