logoalt Hacker News

Telaneoyesterday at 10:15 AM2 repliesview on HN

> But recording that broadcast would be.

Is this seriously true in the US? I doubt this is the case in any European jurisdiction.

Recording radio and TV is legal in any other case (the relevant companies didn't want that to be the case either, but we hadn't yet fallen far enough down the hole yet for that possibility to disappear).

To make another comparison:

You record House on your Tivo = Legal (you now have a file you can play anywhere (barring DRM, but libre DVRs exist), you've copied it)

You 'record' House on Netflix (either literally with OBS or just capturing the video stream via some other means) = Illegal

The only difference is the source. The actual video stream could be functionally identical. There's the fact that actual TV and radio isn't on-demand, but that to me is just an implementation detail, and not an inherent reason to treat them differently (then again, I'm not deep into the mindset of defending copyright).


Replies

Manuel_Dtoday at 6:02 PM

Bear in mind that "illegal broadcast" is important here. A pirate radio station does not have a license to play the music it's playing. If recording pirate broadcast is legal, then effectively all copyright laws are moot so long as the copyrighted material is transmitted over radio.

Tivo is legal because cable providers are legally transmitting their cable programming.

Things get different on Netflix because recording Netflix requires circumvention of DRM, which is its own can of worms.

rolphyesterday at 10:50 AM

the thing is its not like a radio or TV broadcast. some countries consider open broadcast to be public domain so once its broadcast its public, you just cant sell it like its yours.

when a server downloads data to you, the server is creating a copy on your hardware right out of the gate.

a stream is a download. a central server, is pushing bits into your hardware, and making a copy on your hardware.

restricting any copying at all means your hardware cant use what you were legally given, because by a split hair definition, the bits are being copied when they move from memory address to register address vice versa.

appending header and footer to a data structure is not copying the data.

the real problem unilaterally, is when you are not a legal distributor, and you provide a copy to someone else. [dont do that]

show 1 reply