logoalt Hacker News

nullholeyesterday at 3:09 PM3 repliesview on HN

> I disagree with the interpretation that it needs to be held physically. Digital ownership is still ownership. I go out of my way to find music on Bandcamp, games on GOG, and rip movies myself using MakeMKV.

Files on a hard disk that you own are still files that you physically own. The only difference between those files and, say, a DVD, is that the encoding is more space-efficient.


Replies

AlotOfReadingyesterday at 3:18 PM

The parent's point is that possession of a physical good is a bright line separation. For digital files, there's a huge difference between [Files you own] on a hard disk, and files [on a hard disk you own]. There are files you can put on a hard drive that you don't own and will ultimately kill themselves when specified criteria are met, like DRM'd ebooks.

show 1 reply
trelaneyesterday at 6:26 PM

> The only difference between those files and, say, a DVD, is that the encoding is more space-efficient.

Also that it's (depending on the format) perhaps not illegal to use the content in the file wit any viewer you choose.

andaitoday at 12:07 AM

I think the idea is that with a book or a DVD you're not allowed to copy it. You're allowed to lend or sell it though.

show 1 reply