logoalt Hacker News

SpicyLemonZestyesterday at 4:15 PM5 repliesview on HN

I don't understand the purpose of an analysis that goes on for pages and pages without even mentioning that Meta says Wynn-Williams isn't telling the truth. I'm not saying you have to agree with them! But if you don't acknowledge their stated position you're not going to be able to make sense of the situation.


Replies

ryandrakeyesterday at 4:28 PM

Of course they are going to deny. Whether or not they actually did the things claimed, there is no universe where denying isn’t the best tactic. So their denials in and of themselves don’t mean anything. Every single company accused of wrongdoing publicly denies, all the way up to and including when they settle or are found to have actually done the wrongdoing.

show 1 reply
unknownfutureyesterday at 4:33 PM

Then take her to court for libel and prove it. Facebook execs have absolutely not earned the benefit of the doubt, here.

show 1 reply
dofmyesterday at 4:56 PM

"Well he would, wouldn't he?"

— Mandy Rice-Davies

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well_he_would,_wouldn%27t_he%3...

rpgbryesterday at 4:51 PM

Just like in Justice, where every suspect always say they are to blame when they did commit a crime.

(It's a great book, Mark and co. are more awful people we thought they were.)

mjamesaustinyesterday at 4:50 PM

There's a clear remedy if she lied about them in print – sue her for libel. And I can't imagine one of the richest corporations in the world would have trouble winning that lawsuit, if it actually were the case.