logoalt Hacker News

ChrisMarshallNYtoday at 2:52 PM7 repliesview on HN

Yeah, I'm not a fan of these things. If they were just ALPRs, I could probably give them a bit of slack -if they tightened up their security-, but all the other stuff they do, makes them pretty much untenable.

However:

> This makes AI powered cameras like Flock's distinct from traditional surveillance or traffic cams, which require someone to manually look over footage in order to find a specific vehicle or individual.

Is a bit misleading. These days, anyone can give an LLM footage from any source, and get this kind of information.


Replies

maccardtoday at 4:17 PM

What LLM can I get and feed hundreds of hours of video into that will give me the position of a specific vehicle alongside when that happened?

An LLM isn’t going to help you here, but basic Computer Vision and a SQL database has been a solution _if you have the cameras_. I wrote a license plate reader as a university project using OpenCV almost 20 years ago.

show 2 replies
erikeriksontoday at 3:07 PM

I think there's a limit to how misleading.

There's a very important difference between "anyone could walk through my door and steal my stuff" and "this person walked in my door and stole my stuff".

show 1 reply
tptacektoday at 5:57 PM

That's interesting, because the ALPR part of Flock is what caused all the problems here; the rest of it, of characterizing vehicles with attributes beyond just plates, wasn't really problematic at all.

show 1 reply
SilverElfintoday at 7:01 PM

Personally I don’t mind having Flock cameras or other surveillance to make it easier to stop crime. Right now in many cities there is simply no consequence for various crimes - especially property crimes. But I want these tools to be protected - requiring imminent danger or warrants for access. I don’t think the answer is to get rid of them entirely.

llm_nerdtoday at 3:56 PM

What makes Flock bizarre is that it's a private business, and this is precisely how police departments are getting around a lot of traditional gates and checks on this sort of thing.

Police setting up a 1984 monitoring system throughout your city, tracking every car, person, activity -- yields lots of questions, oversight, concerns, debate, challenges, etc.

Some private business doing the same, and then letting the same police use it at will as a paying customer -- yay, all of the invasive monitoring with none of the oversight.

show 4 replies
jubilantitoday at 4:17 PM

[flagged]

cyanydeeztoday at 3:03 PM

>These days, anyone can give an LLM footage from any source, and get this kind of information.

Is a bit misleading itself, to do this at scale requires all those iffy data centers.

show 1 reply