logoalt Hacker News

nephihahalast Sunday at 3:37 PM1 replyview on HN

The Viking results were at worst, inconclusive and at best positive. And yet in both cases we have been led to believe they were negative. They are far from the only pointers to life on Mars either, since we've seen pictures of what look like fossilised stromatolites and algal mats, seasonal methane emissions, and discolorations in seasonal flows & ice.

Even the rusty coloured surface of Mars may be due, in part, to organic oxidisation processes.

We aren't talking about Richard Hoagland style cities here (although that Face on Mars is a lot less easy to explain away that some people claim).


Replies

seanhunterlast Monday at 9:34 AM

The “face on mars” is an image compression artefact that disappeared as soon as they had high resolution imaging of the area. Seeing it as a face is highly dependent on sympathetic lighting and the right time of day, like lots of similar features on earth eg the “Old Man” of Hoy which I have seen first-hand and you really have to want to see it as a man’s face to do so https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydonia_(Mars)

show 1 reply