alt Hacker NewsI notice how the title by Ars Technica is much less baity than Nature: "Why have papers by one of history’s most famous physicists been retracted?" vs "Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck?"
Replies
squidbeak • today at 1:02 PM
It's still clickbait and a good example of how infantile these publications are today. Ars and Nature really should be above all these bullshit headline games, but the fact they aren't explains a large part of their general degradation.
WesolyKubeczek • today at 9:57 AM
It’s almost like Nature doesn’t expect its readers to know who this Max Planck guy is. :-)
➕ show 1 reply
For starters, Ars shouldn't write "this journal" when it's about another publication than themselves.