I'm not just triggered by the wording, I generally just find it hard to read. That familiar feeling of having read multiple paragraphs where nothing of substance was said, and you realize the text was either heavily edited or generated.

I'd love to read an article about the topic, but can't recommend this one if you expect high informational quality.

Article does seem quite interesting at a first glance, but I can't say I'm a fan of these GenAI headers at all.

In his About Me

> But now, thanks to AI, I can speed up the process significantly. AI helps me research faster, draft clearer explanations, and refine my writing—allowing me to finally share this knowledge the way I’ve always envisioned.

So I think he's writting articles himself and then running them through LLM to proofread and fix style, and so on.

It is most certainly written with AI. Where are the references?

The only thing you really need to rely on at this point is, if someone who has actually contributed to the Linux kernel scheduler can verify all of this.

If not, then you can't trust that text.