logoalt Hacker News

Retriclast Monday at 7:30 PM2 repliesview on HN

I don’t think it’s inherently obvious that censorship is the right tool for CP.

I’d rather track people downloading CP than prevent them from being able to find it and thus not know who was more likely to be a child predator. Of course any negative outcomes without due process is problematic but there’s tradeoffs here.

Now people paying for CP (including online advertising) creates an incentive to create CP so that’s definitely worth banning. Similarly there’s a justification for banning ownership of CP on the premise you’re going to catch child predators, but do we then lockup kids looking for people their age?


Replies

signatoremoyesterday at 12:40 AM

How do you track them? That means you'd have to know all porn watchers. That's privacy violation. It's no difference than the age verification debate raging on here. Violation of the privacy of the majority for a tiny amount of violation.

show 1 reply
nonethewiseryesterday at 12:57 AM

>I don’t think it’s inherently obvious that censorship is the right tool for CP.

Very interesting.

What about revenge porn? A scorned lover who posts explicit content of their ex.

show 1 reply