alt Hacker News> It also performs poorly in a chat without tools, exhibiting an ehthusiasm for hallucination. I’m currently working on a replication of this with full tool access, including bash/Python, which may allow this model to be competitive.
How is that a serious phrase in '26? I mean I have no idea if this fine-tune is good, haven't tried it, but testing a (clearly) agentic model without tool access and expecting it to work is crazy, no? What was he even testing?!
Replies
vikingcat • last Monday at 8:10 PM
Maybe expecting it to recognize it's limitation without tools instead of hallucinate. But yeah, not wholly useful. It's performance (and proclivity to hallucinations) with tools is what really matters.
reactordev • last Monday at 9:07 PM
Visual Inspection Before Execution… it’s all vibe…
Last thing you want a model to do is hallucinate a tool call and it's outputs...