logoalt Hacker News

Retr0idtoday at 12:44 PM3 repliesview on HN

Special-casing support for GrapheneOS would be a band-aid, they should find a way to avoid requiring remote attestation in the first place, so anyone can use whatever OS they like on whatever hardware they like.


Replies

microtonaltoday at 2:10 PM

I think there are two fights that are both worth fighting:

1. Completely outlawing remote attestation.

2. In a world where remote attestation is given, let it be controlled in a fair way and not just by Google and Apple.

The risk is that only fighting for (1) leaves you in a world with remote attestation, where only Google and Apple can decide who gets to pass and who not. In fact, that is pretty much the world we are in already.

I agree that they are both worth fighting for, but I think (2) is much easier to accomplish, simply because Play Integrity is probably a DMA violation. (IANAL blah blah)

show 2 replies
hmlwilliamstoday at 1:41 PM

As outlined here: https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-gu..., GrapheneOS isn't implementing something unique, it's implementing Android Hardware Attestation: https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/security-...

show 1 reply
testhesttoday at 1:22 PM

Agreed, it should be open standards only.

show 1 reply