alt Hacker News> allows the reviewer to reject it on the "AI" grounds
… but still unfortunately leaves reviewers having to spend time checking submissions and rejecting them.
Replies
fendy3002 • today at 10:36 AM
oh but it'll be very2 helpful and the time spent will be short. It's easy to verify:
* new contributor?
* more than 10 files affected (higher count are more valid)?
* wall of text on description without screenshots, etc?
just close the PR as AI, and then the contributor can challenge it if they feel it should not.
➕ show 1 reply
At least half the people firing off LLM generated PRs will have left the "Coauthored-by: Claude" line on it allowing automated rejections.