logoalt Hacker News

sriramgopalantoday at 5:52 PM4 repliesview on HN

How can it be legal to charge a higher fee for the Fable model, if most of the usage will default to a cheaper model behind the scenes?

It is one thing if I, as the user, choose to down-level but Claude shouldn't do this on its own.


Replies

mnmx6ttoday at 6:10 PM

Judging from their site, I think it should be OK:

"You won't be charged Fable prices for rerouted requests. Learn more about how the fallback experience works."

https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable Under "Safeguards"

show 2 replies
rcr-antitoday at 6:00 PM

Originally at least the switch wasn't silent and whether to halt or auto switch was a setting in Claude Code.

cyanydeeztoday at 6:06 PM

because it's all indistinguishable from magic when it's a cloud SaaS.

Not like you can tell the difference if you dont own any of the implementation.

simianwordstoday at 5:57 PM

They are transparent. Don’t use it if you don’t want to. These things shouldn’t be illegal.

show 2 replies