logoalt Hacker News

boramalpertoday at 5:53 PM6 repliesview on HN

Is anyone still (or has anyone ever) used IPFS in production?

I’m not talking about technology demos such as Wikipedia-on-IPFS (which indeed worked and was impressive) but where IPFS is actually being relied on for some functionality.


Replies

ydjtoday at 7:22 PM

At meta, there was a project for delivering binaries of internally built libraries / binaries to dev laptops using a private ipfs network. This was live for at least some period of time.

errpunktjosetoday at 6:11 PM

https://swap.cow.fi uses it for order metadata registering iirc

MattCruikshanktoday at 6:10 PM

It doesn't seem like it's popular to put old game ROMs on IPFS...? And that surprises me...

show 1 reply
Borg3today at 7:03 PM

Yeah.. IPFS is a bit disappointement. I was a bit exceited about it back in the day. Recently, I wanted to download sth large from archive.org, I used torrent (and my legacy torrent client) and it worked like a charm!

It seems pure HTTP tracker + Torrent is good enough.

show 1 reply
frollogastontoday at 6:11 PM

NFT artwork, if you count that. Briefly checked, the ones that were traded for the most were using IPFS rather than HTTP. But I also don't trust that these aren't self-wash sales (easy given the "NF" part), also NFTs are dumb.

show 1 reply
pixel_poppingtoday at 6:08 PM

It's funny because even in Piracy, IPFS has never really taken off and that's a massive use case.

show 2 replies