logoalt Hacker News

adam_arthurtoday at 4:46 AM1 replyview on HN

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36756765/

Lowest risk is around 18-20 BMI in this recent study, which controls for many confounding factors not controlled for in other studies.

Other studies show slightly higher troughs, but often don't sufficiently control for correlation of weight with health in elderly people.

From this study: Estimates of mortality differences by body mass index (BMI) are likely biased by: (1) confounding bias from heterogeneity in body shape; (2) positive survival bias in high-BMI samples due to recent weight gain; and (3) negative survival bias in low-BMI samples due to recent weight loss

And if you follow the longevity/health space and studies as they come out, it's becoming pretty clear that bodyfat is objectively bad for you above a pretty low baseline.

It shows up in insulin resistance, heart markers, inflammation, and once you control for confounding factors sufficiently, mortality.

You likely won't become diabetic with a bodyfat of 25%, but all your health markers will be worse than somebody at 15%. This is measurable and clear.


Replies

IndySuntoday at 5:59 AM

BMI, in many cases, is considered a poor measure of health.

https://www.sciencefocus.com/comment/bmi-we-know-its-flawed-...