logoalt Hacker News

lyu07282today at 6:08 AM1 replyview on HN

it was just a few years before my time, I sometimes read through old threads on usenet it feels like internet archeology. If you still remember it, what do you think about how it compares with today's discussion culture?

Killfiles are interesting, but nowadays it seems almost impossible to block everyone crazy on X/Twitter, perhaps more feasible back then

a few months ago for example from my usenet archeology: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47160709


Replies

ggmtoday at 6:37 AM

It was slower. In a beneficial way.

There was a low enough cohort you could talk to people of some significance or notoriety and get a response.

The barrier between email and news was dilute, osmotic pressure effects meant things leaked.

A lot of specialist interest lists on BITNET or the European news network (Jacob Palme in Sweden ran something I used to read on a dec-10) stayed in their own island, so the middle east camel breeding BITNET mailing list which ran out of the hospital network on IBM hardware didn't bridge but comp.lang.c went to a lot of places.

BDFL is not quite the tone but the "great renaming" was imposed not consensus. Likewise Brad Templeton and others first forays into commercial service came as a bit of a surprise.

Honeydanber (Peter Honeyman and somebody else) made !addressing go away and we loved it but they persisted in corners. Decnet also meant user::path forms so there was a lot of background processing masking things.

people got upset about surprising things. Kremvax made some people very angry.

Mark V Shaney was funny but punking the net.singles people was less funny but when we found out everyone was a construct of Rob Pike's imagination it became funny again.

BIFF WAS REAL.

Many things like "real programmers don't eat quiche" pre-dated Usenet but got mothered in. We did paper samizdat spoof tech papers in snailmail long after Usenet made them a bit redundant.