Interesting. But if Sam really believes that the US public should share in the benefits of AI surely the number should be 50% not 5%.
Agreed. 5% seems like enough to throw a dog a bone, but not have enough skin in the game
What's your basis for conflating government ownership with public benefit?
Seems to me like it creates a lot of perverse incentives.
Why 50% and not 100%? The obvious answer is it creates strange incentives. Maybe something like 5% across the board for all large tech companies make sense?