logoalt Hacker News

vladmktoday at 1:48 PM7 repliesview on HN

Seems like a lot of CEOs overestimated the speed of AI, but also it is inevitable.


Replies

lumosttoday at 1:58 PM

it's a common missconception that engineers spend most of their time producing code based on documented requirements in jira tickets.

I'd believe that a complete automation of this aspect of our industry would only be enough to provide a 10-20% boost in productivity. Still impressive, but within the range of "Our team improved our CI, build times, development process etc."

show 3 replies
goldenarmtoday at 1:55 PM

Is AGI really inevitable ? Claiming something is inevitable is a great way to disarm critical thinking.

show 5 replies
ozgrakkurttoday at 4:49 PM

Expiration of sun is also inevitable

marginalia_nutoday at 2:29 PM

What it boils down to is that speed without direction is at best a waste of time and at worst a recipe for a roadrunner shaped hole in a solid cliff wall. Velocity is a vector, speed is a scalar. AI may help with speed, but it sure as hell doesn't help you move the right way.

show 1 reply
aurareturntoday at 2:26 PM

I don't see how this is the same. This is about Meta falling behind in training competitive LLMs against Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Chinese labs.

dylan604today at 2:15 PM

Remember, the internet was born and touted to be the greatest technology invention in human kind before the bubbled popped but didn't die. It evolved into something else while other technology caught up before it became what it is now. (I'm strictly talking about the techy things it can do, and definitely not how content is now pretty much only from a handful of major social sites.) I'm getting the same vibes from whatever AI is now. Your inevitable part might not be wrong, but it really feels like we might have to get a bubble popping and a restart because the hype is way out ahead of where the tech actually is very similar to web1.0. But what do I know?

overgardtoday at 2:24 PM

AI requires trillions of dollars of investment to keep going because it can't turn a profit and has a massive public backlash because the majority of people dislike it and distrust it. Companies have to force their employees to use it. It can only exist because of the massive amount of free knowledge it feeds on. It does not seem inevitable at all. This is the most forced-upon-us technology in history. It's only "inevitable" in the sense that it's extremely exciting to the greedy and lazy.