alt Hacker NewsOh machine learning has been useful for measuring deterministic and non deterministic outputs for a long time.
But that’s not the argument here, is it?
So the question still stands.
Oh machine learning has been useful for measuring deterministic and non deterministic outputs for a long time.
But that’s not the argument here, is it?
So the question still stands.
My understanding of your argument is (paraphrasing):
> > People try to excuse AI issues/failure modes by saying humans have them too, but even if they're equally bad then what would be the whole point of replacing a human worker with AI?
To which my response is that speed and cost are also important factors, which can often give AI the edge in considerations when quality/error rate is equal.
If you meant something other than that, you may have to specify.