> was going back and forth on whether it was for far longer than I should have been.

Please consider that the fault here might be in you, not the text.

> When it's this poorly executed, yes it needs to be said

Isn't that a mark of great satire? That the argument sort of works within the zeitgeist, thereby showing the zeitgeist to be corrupted.

Over-the-top satire is funny. But it's clumsy. The fact that some people who are being satirised will agree with the satire is what makes it great.