logoalt Hacker News

grebcyesterday at 10:35 PM4 repliesview on HN

I’m not sure regular internet access is changing the risk like you say, but I agree that people like connectivity and hence will do more risky things because they think it’s safer.

Rescues even with EPIRB’s can still be difficult.


Replies

arcticfoxyesterday at 10:56 PM

This seems like a crazy position to me. In what world is someone with connectivity not significantly safer in remote areas? Obviously doesn't help with immediately fatal scenarios (falls, drowning etc), but there are whole classes of getting-lost or losing-mobility disasters that just don't exist anymore with connectivity.

mikert89yesterday at 11:04 PM

this is an absurd thing to say, there are so many situations that are way safer with more information. alot of bad situations happen when people make the wrong decision under uncertainty, or they are in over their head. access to the internet, and increasingly claude, is incredible and changes alot of outdoors risk for the right users

show 1 reply
dudulyesterday at 11:07 PM

How is it not safer to have access to information and be able to contact people from your remote location?

Does it make you absolutely 100% safe? No. Does it suddenly nullify any potential risky scenario? No. But it is pretty idiotic to say that it doesn't change the risk. It very clearly changes the risk and reduces it drastically.

show 1 reply
sojournercyesterday at 11:44 PM

I agree with your attitude. Technology can give false confidence.

Self-rescue, and self-sufficiency are priority, not some sense that someone will come save you if things go wrong.