logoalt Hacker News

Eufratyesterday at 9:22 PM4 repliesview on HN

Some people, myself included, think that announcing a conversion from Rust to Zig as an experiment then jumping to putting it in the alpha train for public testing/consumption without any real explanation in the span of around 2 weeks is irresponsible and reckless.

Blogposts were promised, details were hinted, but no, it’s just full steam ahead because the AI worked so well. The converted unit tests all worked, all the synthetic tests are okay, so what are you complaining about?

At some point, it’s less about the technical questions and more about getting that pesky human buy-in.


Replies

nine_ktoday at 12:50 AM

They are looking for a different human buy-in.

"Yes, the AI rewrote the code. No, we do not pretend that we've scrutinized the code, or that we understand it. It works, tests pass, so we don't care, and so shouldn't you."

The "recklessness" is offered as the new normal. Because it kinda, well, works for them.

show 2 replies
johncolanduoniyesterday at 10:00 PM

What does Bun’s governance look like? Now that Anthropic bought the company are there significant external contributors that would expected to have input on a decision like this?

show 1 reply
shartsyesterday at 11:02 PM

IMO it’s reckless to not pin down ones dependencies. No need to pull the latest experimental hotness

show 1 reply
burnteyesterday at 11:43 PM

How about testing the output? Seems like the ultimate test. If the output's still good, I guess the rewrite didn't hurt.

show 2 replies