logoalt Hacker News

foxglaciertoday at 1:03 PM1 replyview on HN

Do you mean 11 years is a "long" time? I'd say it doesn't matter how long it was - it ended up better the expected based on the miles, and since it was a high-mileage-per-year car, that supports the claim that degradation is determined (at least more than expected) by calendar years, as cgyv.. claimed. I don't see how it doesn't support his claim.


Replies

defrosttoday at 1:12 PM

It's all moot speculation in the absence of any firm notation of what cgyvbunji considers "calendar age based degradation" to be.

show 1 reply