> I think a "resilience to hardships" would be a better definition of quality
Does this refer only to program behaviour? I figure readability should count toward quality, but it doesn't directly affect program behaviour.
I think readability is very important for quality. It creates resilience against any hardship that requires changing the code, which is probably most hardships.
I think readability is very important for quality. It creates resilience against any hardship that requires changing the code, which is probably most hardships.