logoalt Hacker News

Abishek_Muthiantoday at 3:58 AM2 repliesview on HN

Which CPU gen are you suggesting, is there any writeup on such setup where <10K (not incl. power bill) cpu only rig is giving usable token speeds on latest SoTA open weights models?

In my experience with rig half that cost, entire exercise of running coding models locally has been a huge disappointment.

Cost/Value when compared to cloud services is just not there, but I see the merit for those who value privacy over quality of output and want a backup of huge condensed corpus of data within their control.

Kudos to OP though, They had clear goals and they achieved it.


Replies

walrus01today at 5:32 AM

I realized I didn't answer the CPU question, as a very quickly chosen example from eBay, there's a Dell R740XD with two Xeon Gold 6254 CPUs, 768GB RAM for sale for something like $5799 USD right now. I'm sure if I put some more time into it I could piece together something with a full terabyte for around the same price. Or faster/better CPUs, more core count CPUs by buying the system with no RAM, or minimal RAM (64GB) and then adding the DIMM kits from the more reputable refurb server part vendors on ebay.

It won't be fast at all, for certain, but it'll have enough memory to prove a configuration and be able to really use gargantuan GGUF format LLMs in the latest compiled llama-server. Re: electricity, I pay the equivalent of $0.07 ro $0.09 USD per kWh so it's not an extreme burden to have a theoretical 500W server running. Something like $35 to $50 of electricity a month if it's 500W 24x7.

walrus01today at 4:27 AM

I think there is a good sized population of people who absolutely don't want to submit everything they do to an off site service, or let their content be used for unknown training purposes, and will tolerate slowness at 1 to 10 tok/s as a tradeoff.

Or people who want or need to run an uncensored (abliterated) gguf file to deal with controversial topics that a paid LLM service will refuse to work with or ban you for.