logoalt Hacker News

ck2yesterday at 6:05 PM4 repliesview on HN

no, just no

make them pre-pay a multi-trillion cleanup and cancer fund for all the toxic waste, not just the launches but pollution burning up in the atmosphere

* https://satellitemap.space/

* https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-space-orbit-satellit...

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787042


Replies

usuiyesterday at 6:08 PM

You want them to pay a multi-trillion dollar clean-up and cancer fund for car-sized multi-year-service-life satellites burning up in the atmosphere? How much do you want incumbent multi-decade culprits to pay?

EDT: I should have clarified I'm not only talking about incumbent satellite companies because people are replying about the launch volume. Think about pollution from oil companies and coal plants and consider how that compares to an aerospace company. How much have polluting companies been fined relative to multiple trillions of dollars?

show 5 replies
ThrowawayTestryesterday at 6:12 PM

Do you have any proof that starlink satellites are worse than the tons of space debris that enter the atmosphere every day?

show 2 replies
ls612yesterday at 6:14 PM

The amount of matter which enters Earth's atmosphere from non-manmade sources is far higher than any conceivable amount of space junk today.

show 1 reply
redsocksfan45yesterday at 6:11 PM

[dead]