alt Hacker News> Separate question, separate table. This is our standard latency harness (three short prompts, five reps, 400-token cap), not the build tasks. tok/s is output tokens over wall-clock, uniform for all.
> so their tok/s is a ceiling, not a true decode rate. The clear read: the GPT-5.6 tiers are the snappiest models here on short prompts (Luna answers in about a second), Qwen is absurdly cheap and fast, and DeepSeek and GLM are the slowpokes
You put in a lot of good work, and kudos for that, but man, reading paragraphs like these just puts me off of the entire piece.
Like…how hard would it have been really to type these two sentences by hand, in your own natural voice?
Replies
It's so telling and offputting.
Please write like a normal human and put the effort in to type what you want to say. Using AI to make your writing is not only lazy, it's bland, tiresome, and disrespectful of the reader's time.
For the arguments sake: What if that is the authors natural voice?
Eh? I write that way sometimes. Long before LLMs.
I'm sick and tired of reading comments like these.
> how hard would it have been really to type these two sentences by hand, in your own natural voice
On the other hand, do we have to complain about every seemingly AI written text?
Yeah, I can't figure out where this "voice" comes from and it is so impossible to get rid of. It is so grating.