alt Hacker NewsThing is, I have takrn a class like that. Was a political science class. Extreme hard right (chinese dissident, hard anti-left).
I wrote the requisite papers. All of them were F, with no commentary. I brought this to the department chair, and the grades changed to b's and a-'s.
He was absolutely grading on political position for the paper, and not a proper discussion of content per the rubric.
And, aside from going to the chair every time, theres little you can do to fight this sort of obvious bias.
I don't understand how this happened. Surely you picked up enough of the lecturer's views during the lectures and you knew what you had to say to get a good grade. So why didn't you do it?
The way I see it, the humanities classes are there to make sure you learn the non-technical aspects of life well enough to be a functioning member of the adult world. To succeed in life, one of the things you need to be able to do is read the room and decide what to say and what to skip. As a hiring manager, I want to hire people who get it and aren't always bumping heads or causing unnecessary friction.
So in that sense, success in these courses is a good signal for hiring managers.
P.S. You ultimately did succeed in getting that signal, because you got them to change your grade using resourcefulness and persistence. Which are also important soft skills I want as a hiring manager. So overall I would say the system is working just fine.