Is The Register known for objectively reporting facts? If so, I have fundamentally misunderstood it for a quarter century.
They basically re-report press releases. I've dealt with The Register as well as their sister publications back when I was still in product (especially during shudder RSA).
The Reg keeps a snarky tone, but immediately becomes deferential once a vendor begins a content campaign with them.
They also operated a bot account on HN for years that was spamming Register articles for almost 3 years and accumulated 66K karma until I and a couple others complained about it.
> objectively reporting facts?
I believe so. They're not known for neutrally reporting them, which is different.