> If you don't intend to write misleading stuff that makes Zig look bad
What misleading stuff? Makes Zig look bad how?
The posts I read were appreciative to Zig.
The only “misleading” piece of either blog post that I recall was the Andrew Kelley claim that Bun wasn’t fuzzing, which was easily refuted by pointing to their fuzzing work.
If there’s something more then I’d like to see it, but every time I ask nobody can point to anything other specific.
> What misleading stuff? Makes Zig look bad how?
By writing shit code, then claiming they had to port it to Rust to fix it, when the entire problem all along was their SHIT CODE, not the language.
Just the fact these people have auto-ported their code from one language to another twice now shows they have zero clue how to develop software.